Ben T. Smith IV, a longtime Silicon Valley executive and currently head of the Communications, Media and Technology practice at Kearney, speaks to Global Finance about the post-SVB venture capital industry and the pace of innovation.
Many of the world's richest countries are also the world's smallest: the pandemic and the global economic slowdown barely made a dent in their huge wealth.
Global Finance editor Andrea Fiano interviews Ásgeir Jónsson, Central Bank Governor of Iceland during Global Finance's World's Best Bank Awards at the National Press Club in Washington, DC on October 15th.
The IMF’s $15 billion loan program to Ukraine looks increasingly likely to be suspended at least until parliamentary elections in October 2012, following an early November visit by the IMF that ended without recommending the resumption of lending.
Deadlock over gas tariffs
Highlighting the impasse between the Fund and the government, a few weeks later the head of Ukraine’s central bank suggested the two sides scrap the current program and work out a completely new agreement.
What stands in the way of a resumption in lending is ostensibly the obscure issue of household gas tariffs. In February 2011, as a condition for lending, the IMF—at the request of the Ukrainian government—agreed to substitute a 30% increase in tariffs by the end of June, for the originally mandated 50% increase in April. The IMF views improving the financial health of state gas company Naftohaz Ukrainy as critical to the country’s fiscal health and has demanded that the government reduce subsidies to the company and hike consumer gas tariffs to bring them in line with broader market rates.
But Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, wary of harming the prospects of his Regions of Ukraine party in the October elections, has not implemented the tariff increase but has opted to pursue the same objective by trying to convince Russian gas firm Gazprom, which is Nafohaz Ukrainy’s main supplier, to reduce its rates on gas exports to Ukraine. He has not yet convinced them, and it is unclear whether the IMF would accept cheaper Russian gas as a substitute for forcing consumers in Ukraine to pay market rates for gas.
Ukraine doesn’t need the IMF’s money just now. But Yanukovych’s hand may be forced if a global economic slowdown hits steel exports, a key source of foreign earnings. In the event of a liquidity squeeze and a flight from market risk, Ukrainian borrowers would be cut off—and the IMF might be one of the few lenders around. It may not be long before Yanukovych is unable to ignore economic realities in favor of political positioning.