
SVB Deposits Saved, But Is It A Bailout?
The FDIC’s sudden takeover of both Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank casts a shadow, no matter what you call it.
![]() |
Mexico’s Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador Leads All Polls in The Race to Become the Country’s Next President |
![]() |
Colombia’S President Alvaro Uribe is Trying to Run for re-Election Espite a Constitutional Ban on Doing So |
Causes for Concern | ||
Michelle Bachelet, the Rontrunner in Chile, is Expected to Continue the Market-Friendly Policies of the Outgoing President
For international investors, the main concern is Brazil—by far the top bond issuer in Latin America and the origin of most of the region’s ADR’s in New York. “Brazil is the overriding concern,” says Welch. The corruption scandal has been bad news for investors, who had been generally pleased with Lula. And, until recently, he’d been a sure-bet at winning re-election in October 2006. Now, the Brazilian president is facing several scenarios, with mixed results for the markets. Even if he isn’t impeached, that won’t necessarily be good news, investors believe. “He’ll be extremely weak going into the election [and] may end up not running at all,” says Welch. That would leave candidates such as finance minister Antonio Palocci and São Paulo mayor José Serra, he says. Serra would probably win that election, spelling good news for the markets. Serra lost the last election to Lula but has received praise for his management of São Paulo in the interim and gains from having no ties to the corruption scandals in the current government. But if Lula were to run for re-election, what could happen? “The problem for the market right now is if Lula decides to throw the house out the window to win popularity,” warns 4Cast’s Tuesta. Colombia represents another uncertainty. President Alvaro Uribe, whose policies have been popular with investors, is trying to run for re-election despite a constitutional ban on this. The country’s Constitutional Court is expected to rule on the matter later this year. “That’s a problem,” says Tuesta. “We don’t know whether Uribe can run.” There will be more market movement if he can’t run than if he can, forecasts Welch. In neighboring Peru, the outlook is also uncertain. President Alejandro Toledo, whose constant policy flip-flops have been unpopular in the business community, cannot run for re-election in the April elections. Despite naming five prime ministers since assuming office a little over four years ago, Toledo has been fortunate enough to see Peru’s economy grow strongly the past few years. “This president, as bad as he is, didn’t go back [on key market reforms],” Tuesta says. “With commodities doing well, it’s been easy to manage a good economy.” Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, a former managing director at Credit Suisse First Boston who was named prime minister in August, is popular among investors but has ruled out running. On the other hand, neither will Alan Garcia, a former president who defaulted on Peru’s debt in the 1980s. That, at least, is good news for investors, Tuesta says. Despite the possibility that Bolivia will elect Evo Morales, a radical coca activist, in elections in December, most investors say that will have little effect beyond the South American country. “Bolivia is very tiny within the overall spectrum of Latin America,” says Alvarez. Morales is a close ally of Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, where oil continues to keep the value of the country’s bonds high despite the anti-market policies of the president. Venezuela is slated to hold elections in December 2006, which Chavez likely will win. “In the case of Venezuela, you won’t see any changes in current policies so long as crude oil continues high,” says Alvarez. Another country expecting few changes, even after the December 2005 elections, is Chile. Frontrunner Michelle Bachelet from the ruling centrist coalition is expected to continue the largely market-friendly policies of outgoing president Ricardo Lagos. “I think certainly Chavez has made his point of being a very populist leader,” says Thorne. “But there are lots of incentives for other presidents to disagree.” Lula, for example, came with strong rhetoric and realized that putting aside the rhetoric was much better for the population at large, he says. Most investors hope that will be the result in Mexico as well. |